How can you avoid common mistakes when developing a k-means clustering algorithm?
Learn from the community’s knowledge. Experts are adding insights into this AI-powered collaborative article, and you could too.
This is a new type of article that we started with the help of AI, and experts are taking it forward by sharing their thoughts directly into each section.
If you’d like to contribute, request an invite by liking or reacting to this article. Learn more
— The LinkedIn Team
K-means clustering is a popular and simple algorithm for unsupervised learning, where you group data points into clusters based on their similarity. However, developing a k-means clustering algorithm can also be tricky and prone to common mistakes. In this article, you will learn how to avoid some of these pitfalls and improve your clustering results.
One of the most important decisions you have to make when developing a k-means clustering algorithm is how many clusters you want to create. Choosing too few clusters can lead to oversimplification and loss of information, while choosing too many clusters can lead to overfitting and noise. There is no definitive answer to this question, but there are some methods you can use to find a reasonable range. One of them is the elbow method, which plots the sum of squared distances (SSD) between each data point and its cluster center against the number of clusters. You can look for a point where the SSD curve starts to flatten, indicating that adding more clusters does not improve the clustering quality significantly.
-
Dr. Darshan Ingle
Principal Consultant, Sr. Data Scientist & Corporate Trainer - Python|Julia|R| DA| ML| NLP| Generative AI | Prompt Engg || Deep Learning|Stats| Tableau| PowerBI | Github Copilot | Pyspark
To avoid common mistakes when using k-means clustering, carefully choose the number of clusters, scale your data, and evaluate your results. For instance, if you cluster customer data into too many or too few groups, you may miss important patterns. Scaling data ensures all features have equal influence on clustering. Evaluating results using silhouette scores or visualizations helps assess cluster quality.
-
Sohag Maitra
Senior Data Consultant at I3GlobalTech Inc
Selecting the correct number of groups (clusters) is crucial in k-means clustering. If you choose too many clusters, you might divide your data into smaller groups that don't represent real patterns. On the other hand, picking too few clusters can merge different things together, making it hard to see the distinctions. So, it's like finding the right-sized compartments for your items, not too many and not too few, to make sure everything fits well.
Another common mistake when developing a k-means clustering algorithm is to ignore the scale and distribution of your data. K-means clustering is based on the Euclidean distance between data points, which means that features with larger values or ranges will have more influence on the clustering results than features with smaller values or ranges. This can skew the clusters and make them less meaningful. To avoid this, you should normalize your data before applying k-means clustering, so that each feature has a similar scale and distribution. You can use different normalization techniques, such as standardization, min-max scaling, or z-score normalization, depending on your data characteristics and preferences.
-
James Demmitt, MBA
CEO, Purveyor of customer value, innovation, and employee growth. Always a student. | USMC Veteran
Choose normalization techniques based on data distribution, with z-score for Gaussian distributions or min-max scaling otherwise. Use robust scalers to lessen outlier impact. Post-normalization, assess through visualizations to ensure data integrity is maintained. Apply the same normalization parameters to both training and test sets to avoid bias. Consider feature weighting if certain attributes are more crucial to the clustering outcome.
-
Sohag Maitra
Senior Data Consultant at I3GlobalTech Inc
Normalizing your data is like making sure all the numbers play fair. It's important because sometimes the numbers can be really big or small, and that can affect how the k-means clustering works. When you normalize, you scale all the numbers so they are on a level playing field. This helps the algorithm to give equal importance to all the features and find clusters based on their actual relationships, not just the size of the numbers. So, it's like changing the rules to make sure everyone gets a fair chance in the game.
A third common mistake when developing a k-means clustering algorithm is to use random initialization for your cluster centers. This can lead to suboptimal or unstable clustering results, depending on the luck of the draw. K-means clustering is sensitive to the initial positions of the cluster centers, as they determine the initial assignment of data points to clusters and the subsequent iterations of the algorithm. To avoid this, you should use a smarter initialization method, such as k-means++, which selects the initial cluster centers based on the distance between data points, or k-means||, which uses a parallel and scalable version of k-means++.
-
Sohag Maitra
Senior Data Consultant at I3GlobalTech Inc
Starting with the right cluster centers is like picking the right starting point on a treasure map. If you begin in the wrong spot, you might not find the treasure. In k-means clustering, where you begin can affect your results. So, you want to place your initial cluster centers wisely, maybe by using existing knowledge or data, to improve your chances of finding meaningful clusters. It's like starting your journey on the right path to discover the hidden gems in your data.
-
Harini Kolamunna, PhD
Experienced Data Scientist | Analytical Problem Solver | Award-Winning Researcher
K-means cluster initialization involves randomly placing the initial centroids. This can lead to suboptimal convergence and sensitivity to the initial configuration. K-means++ enhances this process by introducing a smarter initialization strategy. The first centroid is chosen uniformly at random from the data points. Subsequent centroids are selected from the remaining data points with a probability proportional to the squared distance from the point to the nearest existing centroid. This prevents clustering convergence to local optima. Hence, K-means++ has improved convergence speed and the quality of the final clustering. It's beneficial in scenarios where the data might have unevenly distributed clusters or varied densities.
A fourth common mistake when developing a k-means clustering algorithm is to neglect the evaluation of your clustering results. K-means clustering is an unsupervised learning method, which means that you do not have a ground truth or a predefined label for your data points. This makes it harder to measure the performance and quality of your clustering results. However, there are some metrics and techniques you can use to evaluate your clustering results, such as the silhouette score, the Davies-Bouldin index, or the gap statistic. These metrics can help you compare different clustering results, assess the cohesion and separation of your clusters, and validate your choice of the number of clusters.
-
Mohamed Azharudeen
Data Scientist @charlee.ai - Data Science | NLP | Generative AI | AI Research | Python | Deep Learning | Machine Learning | Data Analytics | Articulating Innovations through Technical Writing
Avoiding mistakes in k-means clustering is like navigating a ship through fog—evaluation is your compass. Silhouette score and Davies-Bouldin index aren't just metrics; they're beacons of cluster quality, guiding you to the right number of clusters. For example, retail segmentation often uses k-means; without proper evaluation, you might merge distinct customer groups or split similar ones. Assessing cluster validity helps ensure each group is coherent within and distinct from others, much like ensuring every department in a store caters to a unique customer base.
-
Dr. Darshan Ingle
Principal Consultant, Sr. Data Scientist & Corporate Trainer - Python|Julia|R| DA| ML| NLP| Generative AI | Prompt Engg || Deep Learning|Stats| Tableau| PowerBI | Github Copilot | Pyspark
Choosing random cluster centers in k-means clustering can lead to suboptimal results. Instead, use smarter methods like k-means++ or k-means||. For instance, k-means++ selects initial centers farthest from existing ones, preventing early clumping.
A fifth and final common mistake when developing a k-means clustering algorithm is to stick to the default parameters and algorithm without exploring other options. K-means clustering is a simple and fast algorithm, but it also has some limitations and assumptions. For example, it assumes that the clusters are spherical and have similar sizes and densities, which may not be true for some data sets. It also depends on the distance metric, the initialization method, and the convergence criterion, which can affect the clustering results. To avoid this, you should experiment with different parameters and algorithms, such as k-medoids, which uses actual data points as cluster centers, or k-modes, which can handle categorical data. You can also use other clustering methods, such as hierarchical clustering, density-based clustering, or spectral clustering, depending on your data characteristics and objectives.
-
Dr. Darshan Ingle
Principal Consultant, Sr. Data Scientist & Corporate Trainer - Python|Julia|R| DA| ML| NLP| Generative AI | Prompt Engg || Deep Learning|Stats| Tableau| PowerBI | Github Copilot | Pyspark
While k-means is an unsupervised learning method, evaluating its results is crucial. Metrics like the silhouette score, Davies-Bouldin index, and gap statistic assess cluster cohesion, separation, and optimal cluster count. For instance, a high silhouette score indicates well-defined clusters, while a low Davies-Bouldin index implies distinct clusters.
-
Mohamed Azharudeen
Data Scientist @charlee.ai - Data Science | NLP | Generative AI | AI Research | Python | Deep Learning | Machine Learning | Data Analytics | Articulating Innovations through Technical Writing
Diving into k-means without adjusting the settings is like using a one-size-fits-all solution—it rarely fits perfectly. Experimentation is crucial. Consider cluster shapes; for instance, financial data with different volatility regimes won't fit into neat spheres. Testing k-medoids or spectral clustering could reveal structures that k-means misses, much like choosing the right lens to view a complex image. The key is to tailor the algorithm to the data's unique contours, ensuring your clusters truly capture the underlying patterns.
-
Mohammed Bahageel
Data Scientist / Data Analyst | Machine Learning | Deep Learning | Artificial Intelligence | Data Analytics | Data Modeling | Data Visualization | Python | R | Julia | JavaScript | Front-End Development
To avoid mistakes when using the k-means clustering algorithm, select an appropriate value for k, preprocess and normalize the data, handle outliers and missing values, evaluate clustering results using metrics and visual inspection, run multiple initializations, consider alternative clustering algorithms, and interpret and validate the results. Following these tips will help ensure more accurate and meaningful clustering outcomes.
-
Kannan Singaravelu, CQF
Machine Learning in Finance ⋆ Data Scientist ⋆ Consultant
K-Means follows a two-step process called Expectation-Maximization approach; try addressing these two to get a better results. Always keep relative Inertia lower and/or samples towards closer to the cluster based on Silhouette Coefficient based on the bias-variance tradeoff.